Constructing the Problem of Religious Freedom: An Analysis of Australian Government Inquiries into Religious Freedom
Australia is the only western democracy without a comprehensive human rights instrument and has only limited protection for religious freedom in its constitution. It was Australia's growing religious diversity - the result of robust political support for multiculturalism and pro-immigration pol...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
MDPI
[2019]
|
| In: |
Religions
Year: 2019, Volume: 10, Issue: 10 |
| Further subjects: | B
WPR (What Is the Problem Represented To Be?)
B Discrimination B Religious Diversity B gender and sexuality B public inquiries B Religion B Religious Freedom B Equality B Australia |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | Australia is the only western democracy without a comprehensive human rights instrument and has only limited protection for religious freedom in its constitution. It was Australia's growing religious diversity - the result of robust political support for multiculturalism and pro-immigration policies in the post-war period - that led to the first public inquiry into religious freedom by an Australian statutory body in 1984. Responding to evidence of discrimination against Indigenous Australians and minority religious groups, the report detailed the need for stronger legal protections. By 2019, Australia's religious freedom problem' was focused almost solely on the extent to which religious organizations should be allowed to discriminate against LGBTIQ people. Using the What's the Problem Represented To Be? approach to policy analysis, this paper explores the changing representation of the problem' of religious freedom by examining all public, parliamentary and statutory body reports of inquiries into religious freedom from 1984 to 2019. In their framing of the problem of religious freedom, these reports have contributed to a discourse of religious freedom which marginalises the needs of both those who suffer discrimination because of their religion and those who suffer discrimination as a result of the religious beliefs of others. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2077-1444 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religions
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.3390/rel10100583 |