The current Conflict of the Faculties and the future of the study of religion/s
The future of the study of religion/s cannot be aptly discussed without considering the future of all academic studies (the humanities, social and natural sciences). Based on my experience as a board member of the Science Council of Japan, I argue that there are two major urgent challenges that are...
Subtitles: | Futures |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
In: |
Religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 50, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-59 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Japan
/ Science of Religion
/ Western world
/ Science
/ Interpretation of
/ Empirical research
|
IxTheo Classification: | AA Study of religion KBM Asia |
Further subjects: | B
Academic Freedom
B Basic / pure and applied research B national policy for science B social relevance |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Summary: | The future of the study of religion/s cannot be aptly discussed without considering the future of all academic studies (the humanities, social and natural sciences). Based on my experience as a board member of the Science Council of Japan, I argue that there are two major urgent challenges that are shared by, but not unique to, academic studies conducted in Japan: namely, how and to what degree to meet demands for social relevance; and what to do with the Euro-Western model of modern sciences. I will focus on the former, which stems from the relationships between scholarship and state governance. Scholars of religion/s may miss opportunities to contribute to interdisciplinary debates if they continue identifying applied studies primarily with theology or interfaith enterprises, while being satisfied with neo-empiricism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1096-1151 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2019.1681095 |