Employee Relations and the Quaker Employers Conference of 1918: The Cadbury Company

This article considers the part Quaker employers played in promoting new and different ways of practising employee relations early in the twentieth century. After providing background information to the events leading up to the first Quaker Employers Conference of 1918, attention shifts to the Confe...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kimberley, John (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Liverpool University Press [2019]
In: Quaker studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 24, Issue: 2, Pages: 229-248
IxTheo Classification:CG Christianity and Politics
CH Christianity and Society
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDG Free church
NCE Business ethics
Further subjects:B industrial democracy
B Quaker Employers Conference 1918
B War and Social Order Committee
B the Cadbury company
B Employee Relations
B the Labour movement
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This article considers the part Quaker employers played in promoting new and different ways of practising employee relations early in the twentieth century. After providing background information to the events leading up to the first Quaker Employers Conference of 1918, attention shifts to the Conference itself. The Conference provided a platform for Labour movement activists to state their case before Quaker employers went on to discuss their pressing concerns. The final section of the paper uses the Cadbury company as a case study to examine the ways in which one Quaker company was prepared to ‘experiment' with new and different ways of conducting employee relations. The article concludes by arguing that the Cadbury company was being used as a model of good practice to which other Quaker employers might aspire.
ISSN:2397-1770
Contains:Enthalten in: Quaker studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.3828/quaker.2019.24.2.4