White Privilege and the Erroneous Conscience: Rethinking Moral Culpability and Ignorance

This paper considers the problems that unconscious racial bias and social sin more broadly pose for moral theology's concepts of the erroneous conscience and ignorance. It argues that systemic racism prompts us to reimagine the erroneous conscience and individual culpability for ignorance. I ar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Block, Elizabeth Sweeny (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Philosophy Documentation Center [2019]
In: Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 39, Issue: 2, Pages: 357-374
IxTheo Classification:AE Psychology of religion
KDB Roman Catholic Church
NBE Anthropology
NCC Social ethics
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Summary:This paper considers the problems that unconscious racial bias and social sin more broadly pose for moral theology's concepts of the erroneous conscience and ignorance. It argues that systemic racism prompts us to reimagine the erroneous conscience and individual culpability for ignorance. I argue that the erroneous conscience is useful in protecting human dignity in the face of error and in acknowledging the many ways we err but also problematic because it equates error with concrete action and conscious decisions and does not account for responsibility for social sin. This paper asserts that people of privilege and white persons cannot be morally innocent, but the erroneous conscience as it has been understood in the theological tradition often implies that innocence is the goal of the moral life and only holds us accountable for conscious moral actions.
ISSN:2326-2176
Contains:Enthalten in: Society of Christian Ethics, Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics