Bound Pronominal Objects in Biblical Hebrew: Clarification and Critique
This article builds on the ideas of W.R. Garr who argues persuasively that bound pronominal objects are highly topical, patientive and central to predication. Garr has made an important contribution to the study of bound forms, concurring with Jou.on and countering Muraoka. In his argument, Garr as...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Journal of Semitic studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 363-375 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This article builds on the ideas of W.R. Garr who argues persuasively that bound pronominal objects are highly topical, patientive and central to predication. Garr has made an important contribution to the study of bound forms, concurring with Jou.on and countering Muraoka. In his argument, Garr assumes that prepositional phrases are non-obligatory participants (adjuncts). My analysis refutes his assumption about prepositional phrases yet shows his argument for bound pronominal objects still holds. I attempt to further Garrfs contribution by clarifying the role of prepositional phrases and thus strengthening his claim on bound forms. I do so by analysing (Piel), a frequently occurring verb. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-8556 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of Semitic studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jss/fgz015 |