Pour en finir avec le plan des Actes: La Samarie: une question d'historiographie théologique

The structure of the book of the Acts of the Apostles is disputed. Indeed, the principles of composition used by Luke are multiple, and it is difficult to discern the dominant criterion: literary, geographical, theological, or historiographical. However, Luke himself announces the framework of his w...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fabre, Jean-Philippe 1966- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:French
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters [2019]
In: Biblica
Year: 2019, Volume: 100, Issue: 3, Pages: 408-425
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Bible. Apostelgeschichte 8-15 / Structure of / Samaria / Judea
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The structure of the book of the Acts of the Apostles is disputed. Indeed, the principles of composition used by Luke are multiple, and it is difficult to discern the dominant criterion: literary, geographical, theological, or historiographical. However, Luke himself announces the framework of his work, by the words of Jesus, in Acts 1,8: between Jerusalem and the ends of the world, an entire part will be dedicated to Judea/Samaria. This study shows, working on the Lukan theology of Samaria in its connection with Judea, that Luke builds this intermediate part from Acts 8 (dispersion in Samaria) to Acts 15 (Council of Jerusalem). Lukan historiography used the paradigm of Judaea/Samaria, but also that of Peter/Paul, to articulate Judaism and the Nations. As a result, it raised the question of the unity of the Jewish- and Gentile-Christian churches. This article, by way of conclusion, proposes a coherent three-part structure of the book of Acts.
ISSN:2385-2062
Contains:Enthalten in: Biblica
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/BIB.100.3.3286875