Plagues, Pagans, and Christians: Differential Survival, Social Networks, and the Rise of Christianity

In his book, The Rise of Christianity, Rodney Stark argues that the early Christian church indirectly benefitted from the plagues that struck the early Roman Empire in the 2nd and 3rd centuries of the Common Era. In particular, he argues that the early church's doctrines concerning love, charit...

Полное описание

Сохранить в:  
Библиографические подробности
Опубликовано в: :Journal for the scientific study of religion
Главные авторы: Everton, Sean F. (Автор) ; Schroeder, Robert (Автор)
Формат: Электронный ресурс Статья
Язык:Английский
Проверить наличие: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Загрузка...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Опубликовано: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
В: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Год: 2019, Том: 58, Выпуск: 4, Страницы: 775-789
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности):B Stark, Rodney 1934-2022, The rise of Christianity / Epidemic / Competition (Biology) / Social ties
Индексация IxTheo:BE Греко-римские религии
CA Христианство
KAB Раннее христианство
Другие ключевые слова:B differential survival
B Social Networks
B multiplexity
B network effects
B rise of Christianity
Online-ссылка: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Описание
Итог:In his book, The Rise of Christianity, Rodney Stark argues that the early Christian church indirectly benefitted from the plagues that struck the early Roman Empire in the 2nd and 3rd centuries of the Common Era. In particular, he argues that the early church's doctrines concerning love, charity, and social service would have led Christians to enjoy higher survival rates than pagans, which would have left the social networks of the former relatively intact, while those of the latter in disarray. Moreover, since recruitment to new religious movements occurs largely through social ties, the probability that an average pagan would have converted to Christianity would have been greater after the plagues than before. In this article, we use computer modeling to test Stark's hypothesis. Not only do we find support for his hypothesis, we also show that higher survival rates for either group not only would have benefitted their respective social networks but also would have benefitted their competitor's social networks, highlighting how network effects often flow in multiple and unexpected ways. We conclude with suggestions for future research, in particular how scholars can build upon our analyses and explore alternative assumptions.
ISSN:1468-5906
Второстепенные работы:Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jssr.12631