An Analysis of Some of J. J. C. Smart's Objections to the ‘Proofs'

I submit as a good rule of thumb (but one which is sometimes wrong) that if a discussion of any major philosophical position or proposition ends with the conclusion that that position or proposition is ‘absurd' or ‘meaningless' then a mistake has been made in the discussion. The mistake of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dilley, Frank B. 1931-2018 (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [1969]
In: Religious studies
Year: 1969, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 245-251
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:I submit as a good rule of thumb (but one which is sometimes wrong) that if a discussion of any major philosophical position or proposition ends with the conclusion that that position or proposition is ‘absurd' or ‘meaningless' then a mistake has been made in the discussion. The mistake often turns out to be the accuser's failure to appreciate precisely what the position being attacked really is.
ISSN:1469-901X
Contains:Enthalten in: Religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500003632