An Analysis of Some of J. J. C. Smart's Objections to the Proofs'
I submit as a good rule of thumb (but one which is sometimes wrong) that if a discussion of any major philosophical position or proposition ends with the conclusion that that position or proposition is absurd' or meaningless' then a mistake has been made in the discussion. The mistake of...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
[1969]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 1969, Volume: 4, Issue: 2, Pages: 245-251 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | I submit as a good rule of thumb (but one which is sometimes wrong) that if a discussion of any major philosophical position or proposition ends with the conclusion that that position or proposition is absurd' or meaningless' then a mistake has been made in the discussion. The mistake often turns out to be the accuser's failure to appreciate precisely what the position being attacked really is. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412500003632 |