Quodammodo transfiguratum est in animum: Erasmus' doctrine of the resurrection of the body and its Origenian roots

The paper addresses Erasmus' doctrine of the resurrection of the body in relationship with its Origenian inheritance, its polemical context and the general hermeneutical attitude of Erasmus. The mind-body dualism and the Platonism of Erasmus' doctrine are better understood in relation to O...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fallica, Maria (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [2019]
In: Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum
Year: 2019, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 82-100
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Origenes 185-254 / Reception / Erasmus of Rotterdam 1466-1536 / Resurrection / Body
IxTheo Classification:KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance
NBE Anthropology
NBQ Eschatology
Further subjects:B Origenian reception
B Erasmus' theology
B Exegesis
B Eschatology
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:The paper addresses Erasmus' doctrine of the resurrection of the body in relationship with its Origenian inheritance, its polemical context and the general hermeneutical attitude of Erasmus. The mind-body dualism and the Platonism of Erasmus' doctrine are better understood in relation to Origen's Pauline doctrine of the resurrected body. A passage particularly revealing of this Origenian reception, in a mystical direction, is the conclusion of Erasmus' masterpiece, the Praise of Folly. Through this text, the paper aims to clarify Erasmus' concept of resurrection as transfiguration, from the letter to the spirit.
ISSN:1612-961X
Contains:Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1515/zac-2019-0005