On Kierkegaard's "The Difference between a Genius and an Apostle": What a Difference a Difference (Still) Makes
In "The Difference Between a Genius and an Apostle," Kierkegaard deploys the figure of Paul as the archetype of an apostle, who "does not develop in such a way as he gradually becomes what he is [according to potentiality]." This claim would seem at odds with much contemporary Pa...
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Religion & theology
Anno: 2019, Volume: 26, Fascicolo: 3/4, Pagine: 310-337 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Kierkegaard, Søren 1813-1855, Bogen om Adler
/ Paulus, Apostel, Heiliger
/ Smith, Jonathan Z. 1938-2017
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | AB Filosofia delle religioni HC Nuovo Testamento VA Filosofia |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
J.Z. Smith
B Apostle Paul B Kierkegaard B Pauline Studies B Divine Revelation B apokalupsis |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Riepilogo: | In "The Difference Between a Genius and an Apostle," Kierkegaard deploys the figure of Paul as the archetype of an apostle, who "does not develop in such a way as he gradually becomes what he is [according to potentiality]." This claim would seem at odds with much contemporary Pauline scholarship, which understands Paul's writings as an ad hoc, developing, quasi-guerrilla sort of theology. While this may be the case, Kierkegaard's essay is nonetheless deserving of attention, for it highlights an issue that arguably remains a tacit foundation of Pauline studies - namely, the identification and resulting allure of Paul as an inherently authoritative figure in early Christianity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1574-3012 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Religion & theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15743012-02603001 |
