Eusebius of Caesarea's or Eusebius of Emesa's "Theophania"? Evidence from the Lemmata in "Vaticanus Graecus" 1611
This paper is a response to Alice Whealey's proposal concerning the authorship of certain fragments traditionally assigned to Eusebius of Caesarea, arguing that they are more likely the work of his pupil, Eusebius of Emesa. The paper considers the manuscript evidence, specifically the lemmata...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Vigiliae Christianae
Year: 2019, Volume: 73, Issue: 5, Pages: 507-515 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity |
| Further subjects: | B
Eusebius of Caesarea
B Nicetas of Heraclea B Eusebius of Emesa |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This paper is a response to Alice Whealey's proposal concerning the authorship of certain fragments traditionally assigned to Eusebius of Caesarea, arguing that they are more likely the work of his pupil, Eusebius of Emesa. The paper considers the manuscript evidence, specifically the lemmata in Vat.gr. 1611, in relation to the internal evidence considered by Whealey. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0720 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700720-12341398 |
