Christianity: "A Manner of Dividing the Sensible"

Anidjar's Blood can be read, with Amy Hollywood, as a political intervention designed to alienate and creatively reuse the familiar terms ‘blood' and ‘Christianity' to mean quite different things, namely a set of biologically, emotionally, and politically charged metaphors circulating...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:  
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autore principale: Gow, Andrew Colin 1962- (Autore)
Tipo di documento: Elettronico Articolo
Lingua:Inglese
Verificare la disponibilità: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Caricamento...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Pubblicazione: [2019]
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Anno: 2019, Volume: 31, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 299-303
(sequenze di) soggetti normati:B Anidjar, Gil 1964-, Blood / Catacresi / Cristianesimo / Sangue / Astrazione
Notazioni IxTheo:AA Scienze religiose
AE Psicologia delle religioni
CB Esistenza cristiana
Altre parole chiave:B Catachresis
B Mondialatinisation
B Cultural hegemony
B Religione
B Metaphor
Accesso online: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Descrizione
Riepilogo:Anidjar's Blood can be read, with Amy Hollywood, as a political intervention designed to alienate and creatively reuse the familiar terms ‘blood' and ‘Christianity' to mean quite different things, namely a set of biologically, emotionally, and politically charged metaphors circulating within and fuelling a hegemonic cultural world system. While this is a clear possible reading throughout, Anidjar provides an explicit key to justify these meanings only on page 258, allowing that he has used each term as ‘catachresis'— to command our attention but also to redirect it. Contrary to Francis Landy's wish that Andijar provide an accounting of how (actual) blood in (actual) Christian tradition relates to blood in Judaism, I suggest that Anidjar's project requires nothing of the sort, working as it does at an entire level of abstraction above the plane of paratactically organized and comparable ‘religions'.
ISSN:1570-0682
Riferimento:Analyse von "Blood (New York : Columbia University Press, 2014)"
Kritik in "REDRUM (2019)"
Comprende:Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341447