Religion, Cognition, and the Myth of Conscious Will
Characteristic of the recent cognitive approach to religion (CSR) is the thesis that religious discourse and practice are rooted in an inveterate human propensity to explain events in terms of agent causality. This thesis readily lends itself to the critical understanding of religious belief as &quo...
| Опубликовано в: : | Method & theory in the study of religion |
|---|---|
| Главный автор: | |
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Опубликовано: |
Brill
[2019]
|
| В: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Год: 2019, Том: 31, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 91-119 |
| Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Theory of mind
/ Free will
|
| Индексация IxTheo: | AA Религиоведение AB Философия религии AE Психология религии VA Философия |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Agency
B Consciousness B Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) B Theory of mind |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Итог: | Characteristic of the recent cognitive approach to religion (CSR) is the thesis that religious discourse and practice are rooted in an inveterate human propensity to explain events in terms of agent causality. This thesis readily lends itself to the critical understanding of religious belief as "our intuitive psychology run amok." This effective restriction of the scientific critique of agent causality to notions of supernatural agency appears arbitrary, however, in light of evidence from cognitive and social psychology that our sense of human agency, including our own, is interpretive in nature. In this paper I argue that a cognitive approach to religion that extends the critique of agent causality to the folk psychological experience of conscious will is able to shed light on several characteristically religious phenomena, such as spirit possession, ritual action, and spontaneous action in Zen Buddhism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Reference: | Kritik in "REDRUM (2019)"
|
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341437 |