Religion, Cognition, and the Myth of Conscious Will
Characteristic of the recent cognitive approach to religion (CSR) is the thesis that religious discourse and practice are rooted in an inveterate human propensity to explain events in terms of agent causality. This thesis readily lends itself to the critical understanding of religious belief as &quo...
Publicado en: | Method & theory in the study of religion |
---|---|
Autor principal: | |
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado: |
Brill
[2019]
|
En: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Año: 2019, Volumen: 31, Número: 2, Páginas: 91-119 |
(Cadenas de) Palabra clave estándar: | B
Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
/ Teoría da mente
/ Libre albedrío
|
Clasificaciones IxTheo: | AA Ciencias de la religión AB Filosofía de la religión AE Psicología de la religión VA Filosofía |
Otras palabras clave: | B
Agency
B Consciousness B Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) B Teoría da mente |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Sumario: | Characteristic of the recent cognitive approach to religion (CSR) is the thesis that religious discourse and practice are rooted in an inveterate human propensity to explain events in terms of agent causality. This thesis readily lends itself to the critical understanding of religious belief as "our intuitive psychology run amok." This effective restriction of the scientific critique of agent causality to notions of supernatural agency appears arbitrary, however, in light of evidence from cognitive and social psychology that our sense of human agency, including our own, is interpretive in nature. In this paper I argue that a cognitive approach to religion that extends the critique of agent causality to the folk psychological experience of conscious will is able to shed light on several characteristically religious phenomena, such as spirit possession, ritual action, and spontaneous action in Zen Buddhism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
Reference: | Kritik in "REDRUM (2019)"
|
Obras secundarias: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341437 |