Aimee Semple McPherson's Pentecostalism, Darwinism, Eugenics, the Disenfranchised, and the Scopes Monkey Trial

This article posits that the cultural battle waged by Aimee Semple McPherson in concert with William Jennings Bryan over evolution and modernism was largely focused on a popular social theory linked to eugenics. On July 21, 1925, in the city of Dayton, Tennessee, a twentieth-century watershed event...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: English de Alminana, Margaret (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill [2019]
Dans: Pneuma
Année: 2019, Volume: 41, Numéro: 2, Pages: 255-278
Classifications IxTheo:CA Christianisme
CH Christianisme et société
KAJ Époque contemporaine
KBQ Amérique du Nord
Sujets non-standardisés:B the poor
B Social Darwinism
B modernist controversy
B disenfranchised
B William Jennings Bryan
B Scopes Monkey Trial
B Eugenics
B Aimee Semple McPherson
B Darwinism
B Modernism
Accès en ligne: Accès probablement gratuit
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Résumé:This article posits that the cultural battle waged by Aimee Semple McPherson in concert with William Jennings Bryan over evolution and modernism was largely focused on a popular social theory linked to eugenics. On July 21, 1925, in the city of Dayton, Tennessee, a twentieth-century watershed event became a harbinger of the age: The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes, popularly known as the Scopes Monkey Trial. The public remembers the event as spotlighting the fundamentalist-modernist controversy with respect to the teaching of evolution in the public-school curriculum against the protests of fundamentalist Christians who advocated Creationism. The historical event was far more complicated than the popular recollection. By revisiting primary materials, this investigation will demonstrate that much of the protest voiced by McPherson and Bryan involved Social Darwinism and eugenics and a concern over the impact of these popular theories upon the Social Gospel.
ISSN:1570-0747
Contient:Enthalten in: Pneuma
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700747-04101029