Reading Rahner's Evolutionary Christology with Bonaventure

In his evolutionary Christology, Karl Rahner shares some surprising affinities with Bonaventure. Both envision human beings as microcosmic, that is, as uniquely representative of the whole of creation. Both describe creation Christocentrically, oriented in its design and goal toward the Incarnate Wo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:Rahner Papers
Main Author: Rubbelke, Michael ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Invalid server response. (JOP server down?)
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [2018]
In: Philosophy & theology
Year: 2018, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 507-529
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Rahner, Karl 1904-1984 / Johannes Bonaventura, Kardinal, Heiliger 1221-1274 / Christology / Human being / Creation / Trinity
IxTheo Classification:KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KDB Roman Catholic Church
NBC Doctrine of God
NBD Doctrine of Creation
NBE Anthropology
NBF Christology
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:In his evolutionary Christology, Karl Rahner shares some surprising affinities with Bonaventure. Both envision human beings as microcosmic, that is, as uniquely representative of the whole of creation. Both describe creation Christocentrically, oriented in its design and goal toward the Incarnate Word. Both understand humans as radically responsible for the non-human world. These similarities point to a more foundational congruence in their Trinitarian theologies. Rahner and Bonaventure connect the Father’s personal character as fontal source of Son and Spirit to God’s unoriginated and free relation to creation. If the Word expresses the Father fully, creation expresses God in a real but incomplete way. This grounds a series of analogous relationships between created spirit and matter, human freedom and nature, as well as grace and human nature. From this perspective, Rahner’s evolutionary Christology can be seen as ecologically significant, appreciatively critical of evolution, and ultimately rooted in the Trinity.
ISSN:2153-828X
Contains:Enthalten in: Philosophy & theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.5840/philtheol201862093