Clarity and creativity as womanist ethics for teaching and evaluating theological writing

This article uses womanist ethics and theories of writing instruction to illuminate the experiences of black women seminarians with theological writing at a predominantly white institution. The three cases presented here highlight two ethics for teaching and evaluating theological writing: clarity a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jordan, Zandra L. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
In: Teaching theology and religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 22, Issue: 4, Pages: 253-268
IxTheo Classification:FB Theological education
FD Contextual theology
NBE Anthropology
Further subjects:B Pedagogy
B theological writing
B womanist ethics
B non-traditional students
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This article uses womanist ethics and theories of writing instruction to illuminate the experiences of black women seminarians with theological writing at a predominantly white institution. The three cases presented here highlight two ethics for teaching and evaluating theological writing: clarity and creativity. Already triply marginalized by race, sex, and class, black women are often greeted with unwritten norms around academic theological writing that threaten their self-concept and their development as producers of theological knowledge. This work centers reflections of student-learning on the voices of black women who found their own ways of negotiating these demands. Their responses to the problems of writing for and in white, male-dominated theological discourses provide moral strategies that all writers can employ and that all theology professors can make a regular part of their ethical pedagogical practice.
ISSN:1467-9647
Contains:Enthalten in: Teaching theology and religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/teth.12502