Idem Fecit: Irenical Animadversions on the Boundaries of the Classical Doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement

Garry Williams responds to Michael Lynch's critique of his chapters in From Heaven He Came and Sought Her. The response focuses on Lynch's claim that Williams unduly narrows the definition of classical penal substitutionary atonement to bounds set by John Owen. It shows that Williams did n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Evangelical quarterly
1. VerfasserIn: Williams, Garry J. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Brill 2019
In: The Evangelical quarterly
Jahr: 2019, Band: 90, Heft: 1, Seiten: 3-23
IxTheo Notationen:KAH Kirchengeschichte 1648-1913; Neuzeit
KDD Evangelische Kirche
NBK Soteriologie
NBL Prädestinationslehre
weitere Schlagwörter:B John Owen
B Owen, John, 1616-1683
B Robert Dabney
B limited atonement
B DOCTRINAL theology
B Imputation
B DABNEY, Robert Lewis, 1820-1898
B penal substitutionary atonement
B Jesus Christ
B ATONEMENT (Christianity)
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Garry Williams responds to Michael Lynch's critique of his chapters in From Heaven He Came and Sought Her. The response focuses on Lynch's claim that Williams unduly narrows the definition of classical penal substitutionary atonement to bounds set by John Owen. It shows that Williams did not include in his definition Owen's account of Christ bearing the same [idem) as sinners deserved, and thus did not exclude major Reformed authors. Rather, Williams argued that the classical doctrine identifies Christ's sufferings with the actual sins of real persons, a criterion fulfilled by the authors. The idem question is seen to be more subtle than Lynch allows. The idea of a non-quantifiable specificity in the sufferings of Christ is restated. Significant findings emerge for the importance of imputation and transfer to penal substitutionary atonement, and for articulating the different senses in which Christ bore (or did not) the idem as sinners deserved.
ISSN:2772-5472
Enthält:Enthalten in: The Evangelical quarterly
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/27725472-09001001