Donatism of History: Recent Questions

Two roads diverged in Roman Africa. One led to the movement that came to be known as Donatism, and the other to the so-called Catholic party. The controversy emerged soon after the Diocletian persecution, one side selecting Caecilius as the bishop of Carthage, the other eventually selecting Donatus...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of ecclesiastical history
Main Author: Wilhite, David E. (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press [2019]
In: The journal of ecclesiastical history
Review of:The donatist schism (Liverpool : Liverpool University Press, 2016) (Wilhite, David E.)
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Donatism / Schism / History
IxTheo Classification:KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
KBN Sub-Saharan Africa
KDH Christian sects
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:Two roads diverged in Roman Africa. One led to the movement that came to be known as Donatism, and the other to the so-called Catholic party. The controversy emerged soon after the Diocletian persecution, one side selecting Caecilius as the bishop of Carthage, the other eventually selecting Donatus (and therefore dubbed 'Donatist'). The schism widened when Constantine supported the former and attempted to enforce his party's status. Violence sporadically erupted between these two parties for the next century, around which time Augustine led the charge to bring about unity, ultimately through legal and coercive means. The success of this unification, however, and the ultimate fate of the Donatists is open to debate, along with virtually every other datum from this controversy. The debated nature of the controversy, therefore, needs to be closely examined, for just what paradigm one takes from the outset could make all the difference.
ISSN:1469-7637
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of ecclesiastical history
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0022046918000702