Adorno and Arendt: Evil, Modernity and the Underside of Theodicy

The point of departure for this article is a comparative study of Adorno and Arendt on the question of evil and modernity. To be precise, I observe how Adorno and Arendt present us with very different ways of understanding radical evil as an expression of the modern project of acceleration. This div...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sophia
Main Author: Holden, Terence (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands [2019]
In: Sophia
Year: 2019, Volume: 58, Issue: 2, Pages: 197-224
IxTheo Classification:NCA Ethics
TK Recent history
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B philosophy of history
B Radical evil
B Memory
B Theodicy
B Adorno
B Arendt
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1671596625
003 DE-627
005 20200701121042.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 190819s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-016-0564-7  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1671596625 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1671596625 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Holden, Terence  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Adorno and Arendt  |b Evil, Modernity and the Underside of Theodicy  |c Terence Holden 
264 1 |c [2019] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The point of departure for this article is a comparative study of Adorno and Arendt on the question of evil and modernity. To be precise, I observe how Adorno and Arendt present us with very different ways of understanding radical evil as an expression of the modern project of acceleration. This divergence presents us with a problematic which does not fit easily into the framework of the contemporary post-metaphysical engagement with evil. The latter projects a relational, non-substantive concept of evil addressed under the order of collective memory and against the background of a normatively neutralized order of history. Yet I show, by tracing the continuities and discontinuities which exist between Arendt and Adorno's conceptualizing of radical evil, on the one hand, and the different elements of this contemporary engagement, on the other, how the initial problematic is symptomatic of a continuing investment in history and can only be addressed in terms of such an investment. This investment is the product of a dynamic between history and memory, informing the work of both thinkers, which partially intersects with the Hegelian strategy of theodicy. I thus conclude with a consideration of whether certain aspects of the latter should be rehabilitated. 
650 4 |a Adorno 
650 4 |a Arendt 
650 4 |a Memory 
650 4 |a philosophy of history 
650 4 |a Radical evil 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
652 |a NCA:TK:VA 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 58(2019), 2, Seite 197-224  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:58  |g year:2019  |g number:2  |g pages:197-224 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-016-0564-7  |x Resolving-System  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 58  |j 2019  |e 2  |h 197-224 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 350754427X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1671596625 
LOK |0 005 20200701121042 
LOK |0 008 190819||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053887  |a TK 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL