Faith and hope in situations of epistemic uncertainty
When it comes to religion, lack of conclusive evidence leads many reflective thinkers to embrace agnosticism. However, pure agnosticism does not necessarily have to be the final word; there are other attitudes one might reasonably adopt in a situation of epistemic uncertainty. This article concentra...
Главный автор: | |
---|---|
Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
Язык: | Английский |
Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Опубликовано: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2019]
|
В: |
Religious studies
Год: 2019, Том: 55, Выпуск: 3, Страницы: 319-335 |
Нормированные ключевые слова (последовательности): | B
Schellenberg, J. L. 1959-
/ Религия
/ Вера (мотив)
/ Эпистема
/ Небезопасность
/ Агностицизм
|
Индексация IxTheo: | AB Философия религии CB Христианская жизнь |
Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Итог: | When it comes to religion, lack of conclusive evidence leads many reflective thinkers to embrace agnosticism. However, pure agnosticism does not necessarily have to be the final word; there are other attitudes one might reasonably adopt in a situation of epistemic uncertainty. This article concentrates on J. L. Schellenberg's proposal that non-doxastic propositional faith is available even when belief is unwarranted. Schellenberg's view is rejected since his envisaged notion of faith conflicts with important epistemic aims. Instead, it is suggested that a combination of hope and 'occasional' faith constitutes a substantive religious pro-attitude rationally available in situations of epistemic uncertainty. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-901X |
Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412518000239 |