Faith and hope in situations of epistemic uncertainty
When it comes to religion, lack of conclusive evidence leads many reflective thinkers to embrace agnosticism. However, pure agnosticism does not necessarily have to be the final word; there are other attitudes one might reasonably adopt in a situation of epistemic uncertainty. This article concentra...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2019]
|
| Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 2019, Volume: 55, Numéro: 3, Pages: 319-335 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Schellenberg, J. L. 1959-
/ Religion
/ Foi
/ Epistémè
/ Incertitude
/ Agnosticisme
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | AB Philosophie de la religion CB Spiritualité chrétienne |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | When it comes to religion, lack of conclusive evidence leads many reflective thinkers to embrace agnosticism. However, pure agnosticism does not necessarily have to be the final word; there are other attitudes one might reasonably adopt in a situation of epistemic uncertainty. This article concentrates on J. L. Schellenberg's proposal that non-doxastic propositional faith is available even when belief is unwarranted. Schellenberg's view is rejected since his envisaged notion of faith conflicts with important epistemic aims. Instead, it is suggested that a combination of hope and 'occasional' faith constitutes a substantive religious pro-attitude rationally available in situations of epistemic uncertainty. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412518000239 |