Faith and hope in situations of epistemic uncertainty
When it comes to religion, lack of conclusive evidence leads many reflective thinkers to embrace agnosticism. However, pure agnosticism does not necessarily have to be the final word; there are other attitudes one might reasonably adopt in a situation of epistemic uncertainty. This article concentra...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2019]
|
Στο/Στη: |
Religious studies
Έτος: 2019, Τόμος: 55, Τεύχος: 3, Σελίδες: 319-335 |
Τυποποιημένες (ακολουθίες) λέξεων-κλειδιών: | B
Schellenberg, J. L. 1959-
/ Θρησκεία (μοτίβο)
/ Πίστη (μοτίβο)
/ Επιστήμη
/ Ανασφάλεια
/ Αγνωστικισμός
|
Σημειογραφίες IxTheo: | AB Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας, Κριτική της θρησκείας, Αθεϊσμός CB Χριστιανική ύπαρξη, Πνευματικότητα |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Σύνοψη: | When it comes to religion, lack of conclusive evidence leads many reflective thinkers to embrace agnosticism. However, pure agnosticism does not necessarily have to be the final word; there are other attitudes one might reasonably adopt in a situation of epistemic uncertainty. This article concentrates on J. L. Schellenberg's proposal that non-doxastic propositional faith is available even when belief is unwarranted. Schellenberg's view is rejected since his envisaged notion of faith conflicts with important epistemic aims. Instead, it is suggested that a combination of hope and 'occasional' faith constitutes a substantive religious pro-attitude rationally available in situations of epistemic uncertainty. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-901X |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412518000239 |