Orthodoxy, Orthopraxis, and Orthopathy: Evaluating the Feminist Kenosis Debate
This study examines the feminist kenosis debate, tracing its development through Daphne Hampson, Sarah Coakley, Aristotle Papanikolaou, Carolyn Chau, Jennifer Newsome Martin and Anna Mercedes. Given the diversity of theologies put forth in this debate, it is necessary to have a method of evaluation....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
| In: |
Modern theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 33, Issue: 4, Pages: 529-548 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Sobrino, Jon 1938-
/ Feminist theology
/ Kenosis
/ Starch
|
| IxTheo Classification: | FD Contextual theology NBE Anthropology NBF Christology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This study examines the feminist kenosis debate, tracing its development through Daphne Hampson, Sarah Coakley, Aristotle Papanikolaou, Carolyn Chau, Jennifer Newsome Martin and Anna Mercedes. Given the diversity of theologies put forth in this debate, it is necessary to have a method of evaluation. In order to do this, I will introduce the theology of Jon Sobrino to the feminist kenosis conversation. Sobrino's notions of orthodoxy, orthopraxis, and orthopathy are essential tools for assessing different interpretations of kenosis and advancing an adequate theology of "self-emptying." This analysis leads to a proposal for a comprehensive feminist theological view of kenosis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1468-0025 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Modern theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/moth.12354 |