A Response to G. Scott Davis

This defense of my essay on Vitoria and Suárez argues that my use of the term "religious war" is based on religious authority at least as much as religious cause, and that Davis's decision to discuss only Vitoria limits his ability to come to terms with my thesis. To Davis's argu...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Endy, Melvin B. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2019]
In: Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 47, Issue: 2, Pages: 425-434
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NCA Ethics
NCD Political ethics
Further subjects:B Canon Law
B Suárez
B Vitoria
B Just War
B religious war
Online Access: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This defense of my essay on Vitoria and Suárez argues that my use of the term "religious war" is based on religious authority at least as much as religious cause, and that Davis's decision to discuss only Vitoria limits his ability to come to terms with my thesis. To Davis's argument that for Vitoria war was justified against the Indians only as a necessity of simple justice and to protect the innocent, I argue that his disjunction between simple justice and religious cause is a false one that fails to come to term with the church's primary reason for approaching Indians, with the Thomistic understanding of the relation between nature and grace and between reason and revelation, and with the distinction between what justice requires in relation to the church and Christians and what it requires for others. I explain finally that my claim is not that the Catholic political rulers readily responded to papal calls for war except when it was in their interest, but that papal war was central to the normative just-war tradition of the church in canon law and among major theologians like Vitoria and Suárez.
ISSN:1467-9795
Reference:Kritik von "How Shall We Read the History of Ethics? (2019)"
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1111/jore.12266