The destroyed city as grazing space: Interpretive possibilities in Isaiah 5.17, 17.2, 27.10, and 32.14

In four instances, the book of Isaiah depicts a destroyed city as a grazing space for domestic livestock (5.17, 17.2, 27.10, and 32.14). Scholars typically insist that such language, when it is understood in its proper historical context, conveys a straightforward, negative image of destruction. By...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stulac, Daniel J D (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage [2019]
In: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2019, Volume: 43, Issue: 4, Pages: 678-692
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Further subjects:B Bible. Jesaja 27,10
B Landscape
B Destruction
B Redaction
B canonical
B Bible. Jesaja 17,2
B Isaiah
B City-lament
B Agroecology
B Bible. Jesaja 32,14
B Archeology
B Prophets
B Bible. Jesaja 5,17
B Environment (Art)
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:In four instances, the book of Isaiah depicts a destroyed city as a grazing space for domestic livestock (5.17, 17.2, 27.10, and 32.14). Scholars typically insist that such language, when it is understood in its proper historical context, conveys a straightforward, negative image of destruction. By contrast, this essay proposes that the grazing-space topos entextualizes a concrete phenomenon in which ancient city spaces underwent revegetation in the aftermath of their demolition, attracting domestic flocks and herds. Historical city destruction therefore contributed to a larger agroecological story through which survivors might have begun to imagine the renewal of their livelihoods. Correspondingly, the grazing-space topos served Isaiah's author-redactors as a theological 'pivot point' by which to express their hope for restoration. Thus, a historically responsible interpretation of the topos as it appears in the book of Isaiah today should respect its capacity for both negative and positive interpretive possibilities.
ISSN:1476-6728
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0309089218786087