Moon over academe
The authors consider critically the Annual International Conference of the Unity of the Sciences (ICUS) sponsored by S.M. Moon. Thirty eminent scientists who had endorsed ICUS responded to a personal letter. By analyzing their replies systematically, we identified their rationales in the face of ant...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V.
[1981]
|
| Em: |
Journal of religion and health
Ano: 1981, Volume: 20, Número: 1, Páginas: 35-40 |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Eminent Scientist
B Case History B Open Expression B Religious Freedom B Personal Letter |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Resumo: | The authors consider critically the Annual International Conference of the Unity of the Sciences (ICUS) sponsored by S.M. Moon. Thirty eminent scientists who had endorsed ICUS responded to a personal letter. By analyzing their replies systematically, we identified their rationales in the face of anti-cult publicity. Our experiences represent a case history in the calculated misapplication of the principles of open expression, religious freedom, and the search for values. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF01533285 |