Jacques Dupuis and Chalcedon
This article reexamines Jacques Dupuis's distinction between the action of the Word as such and the action of the Word incarnate. Against recent critics, I argue that Dupuis's Christology is compatible with Chalcedon as interpreted by Leo the Great. I suggest ways in which this Leonine chr...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Theological studies
Year: 2019, Volume: 80, Issue: 2, Pages: 271-292 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Dupuis, Jacques 1923-2004
/ Council (451 : Chalkedon)
/ Leo, I., Pope 400-461
/ Christology
/ Religious pluralism
/ Salvation (motif)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CC Christianity and Non-Christian religion; Inter-religious relations KAA Church history KDB Roman Catholic Church NBF Christology NBK Soteriology |
| Further subjects: | B
Leo I
B Christology B Maximus the Confessor B Jacques Dupuis B Logos B Chalcedon B Religious Pluralism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | This article reexamines Jacques Dupuis's distinction between the action of the Word as such and the action of the Word incarnate. Against recent critics, I argue that Dupuis's Christology is compatible with Chalcedon as interpreted by Leo the Great. I suggest ways in which this Leonine christological approach needs corrective amplification, particularly regarding the unity of Christ and the action of Christ in his risen humanity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-1304 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040563919836241 |
