Jacques Dupuis and Chalcedon
This article reexamines Jacques Dupuis's distinction between the action of the Word as such and the action of the Word incarnate. Against recent critics, I argue that Dupuis's Christology is compatible with Chalcedon as interpreted by Leo the Great. I suggest ways in which this Leonine chr...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2019]
|
| In: |
Theological studies
Jahr: 2019, Band: 80, Heft: 2, Seiten: 271-292 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Dupuis, Jacques 1923-2004
/ Konzil (451 : Chalkedon)
/ Leo, I., Papst 400-461
/ Christologie
/ Religiöser Pluralismus
/ Heil
|
| IxTheo Notationen: | CC Christentum und nichtchristliche Religionen; interreligiöse Beziehungen KAA Kirchengeschichte KDB Katholische Kirche NBF Christologie NBK Soteriologie |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Leo I
B Christology B Maximus the Confessor B Jacques Dupuis B Logos B Chalcedon B Religious Pluralism |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article reexamines Jacques Dupuis's distinction between the action of the Word as such and the action of the Word incarnate. Against recent critics, I argue that Dupuis's Christology is compatible with Chalcedon as interpreted by Leo the Great. I suggest ways in which this Leonine christological approach needs corrective amplification, particularly regarding the unity of Christ and the action of Christ in his risen humanity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-1304 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0040563919836241 |
