Trust, autonomy, and advance directives
Trust has been largely ignored in contemporary bioethical discussions and also by courts of law. The favored language of autonomy, privacy, and rights is useful but insufficient to speak to moral experience, especially the experience of persons who write advance directives, but also physicians who r...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[1989]
|
| In: |
Journal of religion and health
Year: 1989, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 175-183 |
| Further subjects: | B
Central Place
B Advance Directive B Moral Experience B Salient Feature B Bioethical Discussion |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | Trust has been largely ignored in contemporary bioethical discussions and also by courts of law. The favored language of autonomy, privacy, and rights is useful but insufficient to speak to moral experience, especially the experience of persons who write advance directives, but also physicians who receive such directives. The Brophy case is analyzed for its salient features, and a more central place for the concept of trust is proposed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-6571 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religion and health
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00987749 |