The Chronicler's "Vorlage", Kalimi verses Auld

Graeme Auld's argument of the "Two Houses" sharing the same vorlage is rejected by Isaac Kalimi. Kalimi insists that the Chronicler used the proto-Masoretic book of Kings as his source. However, there are a number of problems not addressed by Kalimi including chronological patterns an...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Clancy, Frank (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis [2019]
In: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 95-110
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Hezekiah Judah, King / Jeroboam II Israel, King 787 BC-747 BC / Jotham Judah, King / Rehabeam, Juda, König / Exegesis / Chronology / Dead Sea scrolls, Qumran Scrolls / Bible. Könige 1. / Bible. Könige 2. / Bible. Chronicle 1. / Bible. Chronicle 2.
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Graeme Auld's argument of the "Two Houses" sharing the same vorlage is rejected by Isaac Kalimi. Kalimi insists that the Chronicler used the proto-Masoretic book of Kings as his source. However, there are a number of problems not addressed by Kalimi including chronological patterns and conflicting synchronisms. There is every reason to believe that the redacted proto-Masoretic book of Kings and the book of Chronicles shared the same vorlage as Auld has argued.
ISSN:1502-7244
Contains:Enthalten in: Scandinavian journal of the Old Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/09018328.2019.1600258