Single vs. Multiple-Item Scales for Measuring Religious Values
Investigators must choose between single and multiple-item scales of religiosity. To aid in that decision, single and multiple measures were compared to determine whether they covered the same areas and formed relationships with variables from another domain. The results suggest that single-item sca...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
[1972]
|
In: |
Journal for the scientific study of religion
Year: 1972, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-64 |
Further subjects: | B
Christology
B Moral Judgment B Religious prejudice B Fundamentalism B Individualism B College students B Faith B Coefficients B Religiosity |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | Investigators must choose between single and multiple-item scales of religiosity. To aid in that decision, single and multiple measures were compared to determine whether they covered the same areas and formed relationships with variables from another domain. The results suggest that single-item scales (e.g., the Christological confession and the rated importance of religion) are good measures of an intrinsic proreligious position but that multiple-item scales are better measures of traditional Christian Orthodoxy. The discussion points out conditions when the less expensive but less valid measure is to be chosen over the more valid but more expensive scale. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1468-5906 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal for the scientific study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/1384298 |