Why Christian-Muslim 'Dialogue' is not always Dialogical
This paper questions the usefulness of contemporary Christian-Muslim dialogue by problematizing some of the underlying assumptions that dialogue partners make when they choose to engage in a specific, but altogether common, form of interfaith dialogue. Our critique of Christian-Muslim dialogue is ex...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
[2018]
|
In: |
Studies in interreligious dialogue
Year: 2018, Volume: 28, Issue: 2, Pages: 23-48 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Christianity
/ Interfaith dialogue
/ Islam
|
IxTheo Classification: | AX Inter-religious relations BJ Islam CA Christianity |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This paper questions the usefulness of contemporary Christian-Muslim dialogue by problematizing some of the underlying assumptions that dialogue partners make when they choose to engage in a specific, but altogether common, form of interfaith dialogue. Our critique of Christian-Muslim dialogue is expressed in four impediments which we contend undermine the very notion of dialogue and derail the process before it begins. This line of argument, to a large extent, relies on showing how the engagement of Christians and Muslims in interfaith dialogue is not always mutual, but is often shaped by a power differential that indirectly enables one side to control aspects of the dialogue in a way that effectively predetermines its outcome or defines what counts as dialogue to its advantage. This ensures that the dialogue ends up moving in a particular direction, namely one that reinforces Western liberal values, but ironically fails to produce a genuine dialogue between Muslims and Christians. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1783-1806 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Studies in interreligious dialogue
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/SID.28.2.3285637 |