Barth oder Schleiermacher?
This essay critically examines the view that Protestant theology still faces the conceptual alternative between Karl Barth and Friedrich Schleiermacher. As the author makes clear, this alternative rests on a questionable ontological presupposition that has led theology for the last three hundred yea...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2019]
|
| In: |
Kerygma und Dogma
Year: 2019, Volume: 65, Issue: 2, Pages: 161-169 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Barth, Karl 1886-1968
/ Schleiermacher, Friedrich 1768-1834
/ Theology
/ Science
/ Monism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | CF Christianity and Science FA Theology KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDD Protestant Church |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
| Summary: | This essay critically examines the view that Protestant theology still faces the conceptual alternative between Karl Barth and Friedrich Schleiermacher. As the author makes clear, this alternative rests on a questionable ontological presupposition that has led theology for the last three hundred years to work on the issue of the compatibility of Christian faith with the scientific worldview as well as the issue of theology's own scientific status. Against this, the author argues that religion is wholly and exclusively related to the presence of reality, and that this has epistemic implications that fundamentally differentiate religion from scientific access to reality. This has consequences for the conception and task of academic theology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2196-8020 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2019.65.2.161 |