The centrality of Christology
Martin Luther seemingly never read the works of Nicholas Cusanus; still, scholars have found the relationship between the two to be an intriguing one. In this essay, it is argued that this relationship is best explored as a common emphasis both on divine unknowability and on the significance of Chri...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| In: |
Studia theologica
Year: 2016, Volume: 70, Issue: 1, Pages: 22-38 |
| IxTheo Classification: | KAF Church history 1300-1500; late Middle Ages KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NBF Christology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Summary: | Martin Luther seemingly never read the works of Nicholas Cusanus; still, scholars have found the relationship between the two to be an intriguing one. In this essay, it is argued that this relationship is best explored as a common emphasis both on divine unknowability and on the significance of Christology, and that this common emphasis is closely related to the importance they both attached to the works of Plato and Dionysius at important points in their careers. Given this common framework, it comes as no wonder that they both found the Pauline gospel of justification through faith and Chalcedonian two-nature Christology indispensable both philosophically and theologically. In this way, they represent a renewal of central aspects of the theology of the Church Fathers that today seem both theologically attractive and ecumenically relevant. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1502-7791 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Studia theologica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/0039338X.2016.1172256 |