Religious Representation in Comenius's "Orbis sensualium pictus" (1658)
The Orbis sensualium pictus (1658) was an important element in the pedagogical programme of the Czech Reformer, Jan Amos Komenský (Comenius). Through the use of illustrations with an associated key, it was intended to educate young children about the names and terms of items and activities that they...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
[2019]
|
In: |
Reformation & Renaissance review
Year: 2019, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 64-88 |
IxTheo Classification: | CD Christianity and Culture KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KDD Protestant Church RF Christian education; catechetics ZF Education |
Further subjects: | B
Islam
B Education B Lutheranism B Comenius B Judaism B Orbis sensualium pictus |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Summary: | The Orbis sensualium pictus (1658) was an important element in the pedagogical programme of the Czech Reformer, Jan Amos Komenský (Comenius). Through the use of illustrations with an associated key, it was intended to educate young children about the names and terms of items and activities that they saw in the world around them. Although the significance of the work has long been recognised and has been studied in the wider context of Comenius' philosophical ideas, comparatively little attention has been paid to the illustrations in this work. The intention of this article is to examine the portrayal of religious faiths in the Orbis sensualium pictus as well as to demonstrate that, in spite of Comenius's rejection of confessional differences, they depict Christian worship and religious practice from a largely Lutheran perspective. |
---|---|
Physical Description: | 11 Illustrationen |
ISSN: | 1743-1727 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Reformation & Renaissance review
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14622459.2019.1568373 |