Jamesian Finite Theism and the Problems of Suffering
William James advocated a form of finite theism, motivated by epistemological and moral concerns with scholastic theism and pantheism. In this article, I elaborate James's case for finite theism and his strategy for dealing with these concerns, which I dub the problems of suffering. I contend t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
University of Innsbruck in cooperation with the John Hick Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham
[2018]
|
In: |
European journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2018, Volume: 10, Issue: 4, Pages: 1-25 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
James, William 1842-1910
/ Theism
/ Finiteness
/ Suffering
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
Further subjects: | B
finite theism
B Theism B Pragmatism B William James B problem of evil |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (KW) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | William James advocated a form of finite theism, motivated by epistemological and moral concerns with scholastic theism and pantheism. In this article, I elaborate James's case for finite theism and his strategy for dealing with these concerns, which I dub the problems of suffering. I contend that James is at the very least implicitly aware that the problem of suffering is not so much one generic problem but a family of related problems. I argue that one of James's great contributions to philosophical theism is his advocacy for the view that adequate theistic philosophizing is not so much about cracking this family of problems, but finding a version of the problem to embrace. |
---|---|
Contains: | Enthalten in: European journal for philosophy of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.24204/ejpr.v10i4.1966 |