"The anxiety of influence": Rashbam's approach to Rashi's commentary on the Torah
Rashbam's approach to Rashi's commentary on the Torah is characterized by contrasts: originality and continuity, independence and dependence, open admiration and flagrant aggression. Scholars have clarified various aspects of this complex stance, yet their analyses do not provide a compreh...
| Subtitles: | Research Article |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Pennsylvania Press
[2016]
|
| In: |
AJS review
Year: 2016, Volume: 40, Issue: 2, Pages: 279-303 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Shemuʾel ben Meʾir 1080-1158
/ Shelomoh ben Yitsḥaḳ 1040-1105
/ Torah
/ Commentary
/ Contrast
/ Relationship
/ Influence
/ Anxiety
|
| IxTheo Classification: | BH Judaism HB Old Testament |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Rashbam's approach to Rashi's commentary on the Torah is characterized by contrasts: originality and continuity, independence and dependence, open admiration and flagrant aggression. Scholars have clarified various aspects of this complex stance, yet their analyses do not provide a comprehensive explanation for it. This article argues that Rashbam's approach to Rashi's commentary is not based on methodological principles alone, but also includes an emotional element that is in part unconscious. To analyze these complex emotional elements of the text, the article uses a theoretical model that demonstrates that the ambivalence reflected in the text is not unusual, and in fact can be found in relationships between other writers— “the anxiety of influence,” as formulated by Harold Bloom. This conclusion sheds new light on Rashbam's commentary, including several of its more well-known passages. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-4541 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Association for Jewish Studies, AJS review
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0364009416000428 |