Liberalism without perfection?: autonomy, toleration and education in Nussbaum's capability approach

The present contribution develops a critique of Martha Nussbaum’s attempt to deliver an anti-perfectionist justification of education. First, I argue that Nussbaum’s rejection of education for personal autonomy as a legitimate policy goal of liberal states has untenable normative implications and re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Drerup, Johannes 1981- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Peeters [2016]
In: Ethical perspectives
Year: 2016, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 41-71
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Nussbaum, Martha Craven 1947- / Perfectionism / Liberalism / Capability approach / Education policy / Autonomy / Educational goal
IxTheo Classification:NCA Ethics
RF Christian education; catechetics
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:The present contribution develops a critique of Martha Nussbaum’s attempt to deliver an anti-perfectionist justification of education. First, I argue that Nussbaum’s rejection of education for personal autonomy as a legitimate policy goal of liberal states has untenable normative implications and rests on implausible theoretical assumptions. This, however, also holds for recent attempts to integrate personal autonomy as an aim of education into a political liberal framework of justification. Second, I demonstrate that Nussbaum’s conception of education for tolerance and equal respect relies on perfectionist premises not compatible with political liberalism. Finally the critique is extended by focusing on major problems and tensions that result from Nussbaum’s attempt to harmonize her version of political liberalism with central theoretical and normative assumptions of the Capability Approach. I conclude that in order to retain its critical potential it is necessary to rethink and readjust the justificatory framework of the Capability Approach.
ISSN:1370-0049
Contains:Enthalten in: Ethical perspectives
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2143/EP.23.1.3141834