Origen's parallel Bible: textual criticism, apologetics, or exegesis?
The assumption held by most Septuagint scholars that Origen compiled the Hexapla for a text-critical or apologetic use is challenged. A third possibility - that Origen's motivations were more exegetical - is considered. This third view has not received the attention it deserves, even though it...
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | Electronic/Print 文件 |
| 语言: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | 载入...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| 出版: |
Oxford University Press
2008
|
| In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2008, 卷: N.S.59, 发布: 1, Pages: 1-21 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bibel. Altes Testament (Hexapla)
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity |
| Further subjects: | B
Bibel. Altes Testament Septuaginta
B 文本批判 B Origenes (185-254) B Bibel. Altes Testament Hexapla |
| 在线阅读: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | 电子
|
| 总结: | The assumption held by most Septuagint scholars that Origen compiled the Hexapla for a text-critical or apologetic use is challenged. A third possibility - that Origen's motivations were more exegetical - is considered. This third view has not received the attention it deserves, even though it has been raised several times in the past few decades. Here I examine Origen's life and thought with particular attention to his approach to and use of Scripture. After discussing the content and structure of the Hexapla, I evaluate the two theories that are most often used to explain the genesis of the Hexapla, and attempt to show their insufficiency alone to account for Origen's work. The third proposal is then tested to see if an exegetical motivation fits more harmoniously with Origen's attutude towards Scripture. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0022-5185 |
| Contains: | In: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/flm148 |