Pionierin der Religionspsychologie: Marianne Beth (1890-1984)
This article deals with the contributions to the psychology of religion made by Dr. Marianne Beth (1890-1984), an almost totally forgotten pioneer of the psychology of religion. The article especially contextualizes her initiative to turn “unbelief ” into a topic for research in psychology of religi...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Allemand |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Sage Publications Ltd.
2010
|
| Dans: |
Archive for the psychology of religion
Année: 2010, Volume: 32, Numéro: 2, Pages: 125-145 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Beth, Marianne 1890-1984
/ Religious psychology
|
| Classifications IxTheo: | AE Psychologie de la religion KAJ Époque contemporaine |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
psychology of religion
Marianne Beth
Karl Beth
Internationaler Kongreß für Religionspsychologie
unbelief
Religious psychology
Marianne Beth
Karl Beth
Internationaler Kongreß für Religionspsychologie
Unbelief
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This article deals with the contributions to the psychology of religion made by Dr. Marianne Beth (1890-1984), an almost totally forgotten pioneer of the psychology of religion. The article especially contextualizes her initiative to turn “unbelief ” into a topic for research in psychology of religion, and describes the tragic end the Nazi reign made to her development and career. Born as the daughter of a prominent Austrian Jewish lawyer living in Vienna, Marianne von Weisl received excellent intellectual training. Initially, her wish to become active in the same field as her father was frustrated by the injunction against women studying law. When this injunction was lifted, she went for a second doctorate in law, her first doctorate having been in the humanities. Marianne Beth became very active in public life (serving on the boards of many organizations, including international ones); she travelled and gave lectures and developed a large radius as a prolific author in newspapers and periodicals. Although clearly committed women’s rights, she did not belong to any feminist movement. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0084-6724 |
| Contient: | In: Archive for the psychology of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/157361210X500874 |