"Homoousios" et "homoousios": la substance entre théologie et philosophie
This article takes up a passage in the profession of faith of the Council of Chalcedon in which it is possible to oberserve a certain gap between "what is meant" and the equivocacy of what is actually "said" in the double utilization of the word homoousios applied to Christ. This...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Recherches de Science Religieuse
2010
|
| In: |
Recherches de science religieuse
Year: 2010, Volume: 98, Issue: 1, Pages: 85-100 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Substance
/ Concept of
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NAA Systematic theology VA Philosophy |
| Summary: | This article takes up a passage in the profession of faith of the Council of Chalcedon in which it is possible to oberserve a certain gap between "what is meant" and the equivocacy of what is actually "said" in the double utilization of the word homoousios applied to Christ. This emphasizes the necessity of a philosophical critique of the theological use of any concept. The author extends his analysis to the use of the concept of "transubstantiation" in Eucharistic theology. By assisting theologians in adjusting what they say to what they mean, philosophers remain on the margins of theology, but as interested spectators and their contribution can only be made under theological supervision - hence under the supervision of fundamental theology. If there is to be real rigorousness in theology and philosophy, then philosophical hermeneutics of theological texts and critical interpretation of philosophical texts by theologians are not an option, but an imperative. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0034-1258 |
| Contains: | In: Recherches de science religieuse
|