Deuteronomistic History or deuteronomic debate?: a thought experiment
This study intends to replace Martin Noth's Deuteronomistic History hypothesis with an approach that makes better use of all available data. Three thesis statements establish a new paradigm for future research. First, to the extent that they have Deuteronomy in view, the Former Prophets represe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
2007
|
In: |
Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2007, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 311-345 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Deuteronomistic history
B Old Testament / Canon |
IxTheo Classification: | HB Old Testament |
Further subjects: | B
Josiah Judah, King
B Deuteronomistic history B Bible. Deuteronomium 12 B Bible. Könige 1.-2. B Bible. Samuel 1.-2. B Judges B Joshua B Deuteronomist |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This study intends to replace Martin Noth's Deuteronomistic History hypothesis with an approach that makes better use of all available data. Three thesis statements establish a new paradigm for future research. First, to the extent that they have Deuteronomy in view, the Former Prophets represent not a deuteronomistic ideology, but a Deuteronomic debate. Second, the like-minded intellectuals who produced these scrolls did not intend to create authoritative scripture because their writings were not intended for mass consumption. Third, each book of the Former Prophets presents a distinctive pattern of response to Deuteronomy, usually negative but occasionally positive. In sum, what we have in the Former Prophets is a conversation with Deuteronomy. What we do not have, except for a few late glosses, is deuteronomism. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0309-0892 |
Contains: | In: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0309089207076357 |