Deuteronomistic History or deuteronomic debate?: a thought experiment

This study intends to replace Martin Noth's Deuteronomistic History hypothesis with an approach that makes better use of all available data. Three thesis statements establish a new paradigm for future research. First, to the extent that they have Deuteronomy in view, the Former Prophets represe...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Noll, K. L. (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage 2007
In: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Year: 2007, Volume: 31, Issue: 3, Pages: 311-345
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Deuteronomistic history
B Old Testament / Canon
IxTheo Classification:HB Old Testament
Further subjects:B Josiah Judah, King
B Deuteronomistic history
B Bible. Deuteronomium 12
B Bible. Könige 1.-2.
B Bible. Samuel 1.-2.
B Judges
B Joshua
B Deuteronomist
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Description
Summary:This study intends to replace Martin Noth's Deuteronomistic History hypothesis with an approach that makes better use of all available data. Three thesis statements establish a new paradigm for future research. First, to the extent that they have Deuteronomy in view, the Former Prophets represent not a deuteronomistic ideology, but a Deuteronomic debate. Second, the like-minded intellectuals who produced these scrolls did not intend to create authoritative scripture because their writings were not intended for mass consumption. Third, each book of the Former Prophets presents a distinctive pattern of response to Deuteronomy, usually negative but occasionally positive. In sum, what we have in the Former Prophets is a conversation with Deuteronomy. What we do not have, except for a few late glosses, is deuteronomism.
ISSN:0309-0892
Contains:In: Journal for the study of the Old Testament
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/0309089207076357