Decrees and drachmas at Thessalonica: an illegal assembly in Jason's house (Acts 17.1-10a)
Those who have identified the specific charges of the judicial proceedings in Thessalonica according to Acts 17.6-9 have generally taken one of two routes. The traditional view is that Paul and Silas were accused of treason (maiestas). Just over three decades ago, however, E.A. Judge put forth an al...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
2006
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 2006, Volume: 52, Issue: 1, Pages: 29-49 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Apostelgeschichte 17,1-10a
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Further subjects: | B
Association
B Thessaloniki B Bible. Apostelgeschichte 17,1-10 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | Those who have identified the specific charges of the judicial proceedings in Thessalonica according to Acts 17.6-9 have generally taken one of two routes. The traditional view is that Paul and Silas were accused of treason (maiestas). Just over three decades ago, however, E.A. Judge put forth an alternative hypothesis that the decrees of Caesar in Acts 17.7 referred to imperial laws against predicting the change of ruler. After challenging these two explanations, this essay puts forward a fresh proposal - that both the charges and the seizure of payment in this judicial episode relate to the imperial laws repressing Graeco-Roman voluntary associations. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0028-6885 |
| Contains: | In: New Testament studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0028688506000026 |