Biblische Archäologie im Schwerefeld von Geisteswissenschaften, Politik und Theologie

Talking about „Biblical Archaeology“ is a contradiction in itself, because archaeology is neither biblical nor religious, but an autonomous science. Nevertheless the close interrelation between biblical exegesis, historical sciences, archaeology and sometimes even politics often creates interpretati...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tiwald, Markus 1966- (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Österreichisches Katholisches Bibelwerk 2004
In: Protokolle zur Bibel
Year: 2004, Volume: 13, Issue: 2, Pages: 69-82
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Biblical archaeology
IxTheo Classification:HA Bible
HH Archaeology
Further subjects:B Theology
B Biblical studies
B Archaeology
B Human sciences
B Politics
B Palestine
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:Talking about „Biblical Archaeology“ is a contradiction in itself, because archaeology is neither biblical nor religious, but an autonomous science. Nevertheless the close interrelation between biblical exegesis, historical sciences, archaeology and sometimes even politics often creates interpretation patterns, that might falsify the results. Mainly this goes for biblical ideologies, like biblical fundamentalism or biblical revisionism. But also among serious scholars a certain „abuse“ of archaeological data in favor of their own ideas can be notified. Showing up some of the most common misinterpretations in the interplay between exegesis, historical sciences, politics und archaeology, this article wants to promote a more cautious use of archaeological data by exegetes.
ISSN:1996-0042
Contains:Enthalten in: Protokolle zur Bibel
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.15496/publikation-63431
HDL: 10900/122067