The priestly perspective of the Johannine trial narratives

Researchers disagree concerning depictions of "Jews" and "high priests" in John. Many trace the gospel's apparent animosity toward these identities to Christian rivalry with rabbinic Judaism after Javneh or emerging ethnic differences. Others detect Galilean resentment of Ju...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boughton, Lynne Courter (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2003
In: Revue biblique
Year: 2003, Volume: 110, Issue: 4, Pages: 517-551
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B High priest / John
B Jews / John / Early Judaism / Life of Jesus research
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
Further subjects:B Canavesio, Giovanni Passionsgeschichte
B Jews
B John
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:Researchers disagree concerning depictions of "Jews" and "high priests" in John. Many trace the gospel's apparent animosity toward these identities to Christian rivalry with rabbinic Judaism after Javneh or emerging ethnic differences. Others detect Galilean resentment of Judeans, sectarian polemics, or Qumran-influenced hostility toward the Temple's high priesthood. The study undertaken here, however, proposes that John does not vilify a religious, ethnic, or priestly identity. Instead, the evangelist's goal was to show readers who remembered issues and alignments of pre-66 Judea and who valued the priesthood as central to God's covenant, that the high priests of the Temple, despite the urging of some politically motivated colleagues, did not institutionally authorize the betrayal of Jesus.
ISSN:0035-0907
Contains:In: Revue biblique