Syntactical Evidence of Aramaic Sources in Acts I-XV
Source criticism in Acts has had a long and varied history. While one can hardly speak of a consensus of opinion on the question today, certain trends are evident. The present tendency is to study the smaller units of Acts, rather than to seek for continuous sources throughout the book. In this deve...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[1964]
|
| In: |
New Testament studies
Year: 1964, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 38-59 |
| IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | Source criticism in Acts has had a long and varied history. While one can hardly speak of a consensus of opinion on the question today, certain trends are evident. The present tendency is to study the smaller units of Acts, rather than to seek for continuous sources throughout the book. In this development can be seen the influence of M. Dibelius's 1923 essay on the ‘style criticism’ of Acts. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0028-6885 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: New Testament studies
|
