The Date of Mark's Gospel apart from the Temple and Rumors of War: The Taxation Episode (12:13-17) as Evidence
It is difficult to determine a precise date for the composition of the Gospel of Mark, even if it is widely believed to have been written during the decade spanning 64-73 c.e. I suggest in this article that the academic disagreement is due to heavy reliance on Mark's ambiguous temple-and-war pa...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[2017]
|
In: |
The catholic biblical quarterly
Year: 2017, Volume: 79, Issue: 3, Pages: 422-437 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Frage nach der kaiserlichen Steuer
/ Fiscus Judaicus
/ Mark
/ Dating
|
IxTheo Classification: | HC New Testament TB Antiquity |
Further subjects: | B
Apocalypticism
B fiscus ludaicus B denarius B Frage nach der kaiserlichen Steuer B Geopolitics B Coinage B Roman Empire B Tax B History B Bible. Mark B Jewish War B Farms B Gospel of Mark B War Religious aspects B Dating B FISCAL policy |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
Summary: | It is difficult to determine a precise date for the composition of the Gospel of Mark, even if it is widely believed to have been written during the decade spanning 64-73 c.e. I suggest in this article that the academic disagreement is due to heavy reliance on Mark's ambiguous temple-and-war passages (esp. 13:1 -23), which can be read realistically in disparate historical contexts. 1 propose to supplement such work with an examination of the taxation episode (12:13-17), a pericope with subtle indicators of Mark's historical context, including geopolitical administration, coinage circulation, and tax policies. I suggest that these data cumulatively indicate that the Gospel of Mark was not written earlier than 29 August 71 c.e. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0008-7912 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: The catholic biblical quarterly
|