An apophatic response to the evidential argument from evil
I argue that Christian apophaticism provides the most powerful and economical response to the evidential argument from evil for the non-existence of God. I also reply to the objection that Christian apophaticism is incoherent, because it appears to entail the truth of the following contradiction: it...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
[2017]
|
| In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2017, Volume: 78, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 485-497 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
God
/ Evil
/ Essentialism
/ Negative theology
|
| IxTheo Classification: | NBC Doctrine of God |
| Further subjects: | B
apophatic theology
B ESSENCE-ENERGIES DISTINCTION B real essentialism B problem of evil |
| Summary: | I argue that Christian apophaticism provides the most powerful and economical response to the evidential argument from evil for the non-existence of God. I also reply to the objection that Christian apophaticism is incoherent, because it appears to entail the truth of the following contradiction: it is both possible and impossible to know God’s essential properties. To meet this objection, I outline a coherent account of the divine attributes inspired by the theology of the Greek Father’s and St. Gregory Palamas. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
