Un manuscrit de travail d’Eugippe: le ms. "Città del Vaticano, BAV, Pal. lat. 210"

This paper highlights the discovery of extraction marks in the archetype of the collection De bono coniugali of St. Augustine’s writings (Città del Vaticano, BAV, Pal. lat. 210), which can be attributed to the workshop of Eugippius of Castellum Lucullanum. The extraction marks consist in marginal al...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Delmulle, Jérémy 1985- (Author) ; Pezé, Warren (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brepols [2016]
In: Sacris erudiri
Year: 2016, Volume: 55, Pages: 195-258
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Eugippius 455-533 / Handwriting (Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana) Pal. lat. 210 / Eugippius 455-533, Excerpta ex operibus s. Augustini
IxTheo Classification:KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity
Further subjects:B Augustinus, Aurelius Saint (354-430) De sancta virginitate
B Augustinus, Aurelius Saint (354-430) De opere monachorum
B Augustinus, Aurelius Saint (354-430) De bono coniugali
B Augustinus, Aurelius Saint (354-430) De bono viduitatis
B Augustinus, Aurelius Saint (354-430) Sermones
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Parallel Edition:Electronic
Description
Summary:This paper highlights the discovery of extraction marks in the archetype of the collection De bono coniugali of St. Augustine’s writings (Città del Vaticano, BAV, Pal. lat. 210), which can be attributed to the workshop of Eugippius of Castellum Lucullanum. The extraction marks consist in marginal alpha and omega combined with crosses inside the text. They were used during the composition of the Excerpta ex operibus sancti Augustini around 500 and make it possible to date the ms. Pal. lat. 210 approximately one century earlier than the date to which it was previously assigned on palaeographical grounds. This study thus sheds new light not only on the making of Eugippius’ Excerpta and on the value of the different branches of its manuscript tradition, but also on the origins of the collection De bono coniugali, on the rise of the use of excerption signs in late Antiquity, and on the criteria for dating the roman uncial.
Item Description:Anhang 1 auf Seite 247-253; Anhang 2 auf Seite 254-258
Behandelt u.a. ep. 36; ep. 127; ep. 130
ISSN:0771-7776
Contains:Enthalten in: Sacris erudiri
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1484/J.SE.5.112602