The great Iranian divide: between aniconic West and anthropomorphic East
The Avesta and the Rig Veda, our earliest sources for the Indo-Iranian religious tradition, contain ideas and elements with both aniconic and iconic potential. The cultic iconography in Western and Eastern Iran developed in a remarkably different manner. While the Achaemenian and Sasanian cults were...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Print Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Publicado em: |
[2017]
|
| Em: |
Religion
Ano: 2017, Volume: 47, Número: 3, Páginas: 378-398 |
| (Cadeias de) Palavra- chave padrão: | B
Iran (Antiguidade)
/ Kushana, Dynastie : 200 a.C.-300
/ Sogdier
/ Zoroastrismo
/ Arte religiosa
/ Sinal icônico
/ Antropomorfismo
/ Bilderverbot
|
| Classificações IxTheo: | AG Vida religiosa BC Antigo Oriente ; Religião KBM Ásia |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Sasanian
B Aniconism B Iran B Sogdian B Achaemenian B Zoroastrianism B Anthropomorphism B Kushan |
| Resumo: | The Avesta and the Rig Veda, our earliest sources for the Indo-Iranian religious tradition, contain ideas and elements with both aniconic and iconic potential. The cultic iconography in Western and Eastern Iran developed in a remarkably different manner. While the Achaemenian and Sasanian cults were aniconic, Eastern Iranian people, like the Kushans and the Sogdians, not only made use of portrayals of their gods in human form, but also venerated their man-made representations in temples. This article suggests that the reason for this sharp distinction in the nature of the cult between Western and Eastern Iran is the impact of acculturated Greek religious practices, which was much stronger in the East than in the West. |
|---|---|
| Descrição Física: | 14 Illustrationen |
| ISSN: | 0048-721X |
| Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Religion
|
